Perhaps the impolite interjections from the crowd during Wednesday’s St. Paul City Council meeting — when the city-appointed commission charged with investigating security at the Republican National Convention presented its findings — were inevitable. The scene was comical, in a way: Two former U.S. attorneys announcing to the council and a crowd of irreverent critics of police action at the convention that the city attempted to promote a soft police presence until “violent anarchists” had descended on the city. What the commission failed to do — and what those critics intermittently called for — was to likewise label aggressive police behavior as violent and unlawful.

The report itself has misgivings. Chief among those is that its language is too harsh towards what it dubiously called “violent anarchists” (not to be confused with the more coordinated violent conservatives and liberals). The incident on the Marion Street Bridge the evening of Sept. 4 — when police arrested roughly 350 people, including journalists, after herding everyone on the bridge — “had the feel and appearance of mass arrest.” But the “anarchists” were not “unruly college students or wayward kids. They were violent criminals intent on causing harm to person and property.” If the latter is true — and there are many indications it is — it’s also poorly worded and reflects the report's tendency to highlight incidents of civilian violence while glossing over incidents of police violence.

We do not condone either. But some individuals have already been held accountable for their violent actions at the convention. It would be a shame if St. Paul refuses to apply the same standard to its police force.

More from Minnesota Daily | Top of Page

---

Useful article? Use these tools to let someone know:
Send & Share | Print | Access RSS Feed for Syndication