A review published today by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary on policing protest has recommended that the Home Office clarify the legal 'framework for the use of overt photography during public order operations'
The review, instigated after the G20 protests, comes months after professional photographers complained they were constantly being filmed and monitored by police officers, members of the Forward Intelligence Teams, while covering protests.
In its review, Denis O'Connor found that 'the role of FIT officer has shifted significantly over the past few years, with FITs now often deployed in personal protective equipment and accompanied by photographers to identify and obtain information about protesters. The public order manual does not explain the purpose for which this information is required. This lack of clarity creates the potential for FIT officers to act outside their lawful powers.'
As a result, the HMIC recommends that the Association of Chief Police Officers and the National Policing Improvement Agency 'should clarify the precise role of Forward Intelligence Teams. Public order training should include guidance on the function of FITs and the specific tactical parameters under which FITs should be deployed in public order operations.'
The HMIC has also asked the Home Office to clarify 'the legal framework for the use of overt photography by police during public order operations and provide guidance on the collation and retention of photographic images by police forces and other policing bodies.'
Forward intelligence teams were introduced to provide chief officers with up-to-date information about the movement of crowds and groups within crowds that are likely to be violent or engage in disorder. Currently there are approximately 310 trained FIT officers nationally, with two thirds of those situated within the Metropolitan Police Service.
Review recommends rethink of protest monitoring |